Skip to content

For entrepreneurs and managing directors

Restructuring proceedings in Austria

Restructuring proceedings (Sanierungs­verfahren) are the Austrian insolvency proceedings for entrepreneurs who want to continue their business; they are open to natural persons operating a business as well as to companies (section 166 of the Austrian Insolvency Code, Insolvenz­ordnung, ‘IO’). In a restructuring plan you offer your creditors a percentage of their claims (the “quota”). If the creditors accept the plan and the court confirms it, you are released from the part of your liabilities that exceeds the quota as long as you fulfil the plan, and you keep your business. I prepare such proceedings and represent debtors in them; the court also appoints me restructuring administrator (Sanierungs­verwalter). The first thing you will hear from me is whether a restructuring plan is feasible in your situation.

What restructuring proceedings require

Insolvency proceedings are designated restructuring proceedings if the debtor, together with the application to open them, submits an admissible restructuring plan and applies for its acceptance (section 167 IO). Unlike bankruptcy proceedings (Konkurs­verfahren), they can be opened as soon as inability to pay is imminent. On the Corporate insolvency page I describe the duties and deadlines before filing.

The restructuring plan must offer the insolvency creditors at least 20 % of their claims, payable within no more than two years from acceptance (section 141 IO). The application is inadmissible if, for example, the plan obviously cannot be fulfilled. The quota therefore has to be something that the business’s operations or third parties can actually fund; that calculation is where all preparation starts.

If you want to administer the insolvency estate yourself under the supervision of a restructuring administrator (self-administration), you must submit more, including a restructuring plan offering at least 30 %, a detailed asset register, a statement of assets and liabilities, a financial plan for the following ninety days and information on how the funds for the plan will be raised (section 169 IO). I coordinate the financial plan with your tax adviser. The court withdraws self-administration if, for example, the financial plan cannot be adhered to, if claims against the estate are not paid on time or if the plan has not been accepted within ninety days (section 170 IO).

Self-administration is more limited than its name suggests. Transactions outside the ordinary course of business require the approval of the restructuring administrator, and even an ordinary act must not be carried out if he objects (section 171 IO). Actions for insolvency avoidance (Anfechtung), the verification of claims and certain sales, among other things, are reserved to him (section 172 IO); he supervises the management and reports to the court on whether the restructuring plan can be fulfilled (section 178 IO). Even in self-administration, therefore, the essential decisions are not taken without him.

Without self-administration, an insolvency administrator (Masse­verwalter) administers the estate and continues the business; a quota of 20 % is then sufficient. Which form fits your case depends on the quota that can be achieved, on liquidity and on the creditors’ trust.

The procedure in five steps

  1. Application and opening: the application, together with the restructuring plan and its enclosures, goes to the insolvency court, in Vienna the Commercial Court (Handels­gericht Wien). The opening is published in the insolvency database (Insolvenz­datei); the court appoints the administrator and at the same time schedules the hearing on the restructuring plan, as a rule sixty to ninety days ahead (section 168 IO).
  2. Continuation: the business is continued, in self-administration by you, supervised by the restructuring administrator, otherwise by the insolvency administrator. It may only be realised if the restructuring plan is not accepted within ninety days of the opening (section 168(2) IO). This period shows whether the business covers its running costs.
  3. Lodging and verification of claims: creditors lodge their claims with the court within the time limit for lodging claims (see Lodging a claim); the verification hearing establishes which claims are admitted and which are disputed. That determines what the quota actually costs and how much weight each creditor’s vote carries.
  4. Hearing on the restructuring plan: the creditors vote on the plan. Acceptance requires a majority of the creditors present at the hearing and entitled to vote, and the claims of those in favour must exceed half of the claims of the creditors present (section 147 IO). If only one of the two majorities is reached, the debtor may request a further vote at a new hearing.
  5. Confirmation and fulfilment: the court confirms the accepted plan. An appeal (Rekurs) against the confirmation may be brought by any party who did not expressly consent to the restructuring plan, and by co-debtors and guarantors (section 155(1) IO). Once the confirmation is final, the insolvency proceedings are terminated (section 152b IO) and you may again dispose freely of your assets, unless the plan provides otherwise. The quota then has to be paid on the dates laid down. You are released from the part of the claims that exceeds the quota as soon as the confirmation becomes final (section 156(1) IO); what that means in detail is set out in the next section.

What the confirmed plan achieves

Once the confirmation of the restructuring plan is final, you are released from the obligation to make good the creditors’ shortfall later (section 156(1) IO). As a rule this applies to all insolvency creditors, including those who voted against the plan or did not take part in the proceedings. Anyone personally liable for the company’s debts, for instance as guarantor, needs a separate solution; we discuss that at the outset as well.

The release is subject to one condition: if you default on the plan, the reduction and other benefits lapse in relation to the creditor concerned and that claim revives proportionately (section 156a IO). Default only occurs if a payment that is due is not made despite a written reminder granting a grace period of at least fourteen days. Deciding how high to set the quota is therefore part of the preparation.

If, for example, the plan is withdrawn, rejected with final effect or not confirmed, the court changes the designation to bankruptcy proceedings (section 167(3) IO). A restructuring plan remains possible there until the proceedings are terminated (section 140 IO); whether a second attempt has any prospect of success depends on why the first one failed.

What I handle for you

Before filing, I examine with you whether a restructuring plan is feasible and what the quota will be paid from. I describe how a restructuring strategy is developed in the section “The way out of the crisis” on the Corporate insolvency page. If I consider the plan unsound, I will tell you so plainly.

I then draft the application and the restructuring plan, compile the enclosures with you and represent you before the insolvency court and at all hearings.

Once proceedings are open, I represent you vis-à-vis the insolvency administrator or restructuring administrator. In most proceedings I work together with him in doing so and coordinate the steps with him: the continuation of the business, the documents for his reports, the financing of the quota and the timetable up to the hearing on the restructuring plan. Where it helps to secure acceptance of the plan, I also hold talks with the creditor protection associations and individual creditors before the vote.

During preparation, what happens in the business has to be legally safeguarded: payments to individual creditors may later be challenged by way of insolvency avoidance and may trigger liability of the managing directors. I am familiar with these claims from both roles: as insolvency administrator I bring them myself, and as counsel I advise and represent clients against whom they are brought.

I also represent you when proceedings are already under way, for example when a restructuring plan is still to be submitted in bankruptcy proceedings, and I support you in performing the plan until the final payment. I likewise represent creditors who have to assess a proposed restructuring plan and vote on it.

Courts regularly appoint me as insolvency administrator and restructuring administrator. I therefore know what administrators, creditor protection associations and the court look for in a restructuring plan.

Call: +43 1 712 33 30 Write an e-mail

Frequently asked questions about restructuring proceedings

Process, duration and costs

What is the difference between restructuring and bankruptcy proceedings?

Both are insolvency proceedings before the same court. Bankruptcy proceedings are geared towards realising the assets; restructuring proceedings aim from the outset at continuing the business and at the vote on a restructuring plan, which is scheduled when the proceedings are opened. A restructuring plan is, however, also possible in bankruptcy proceedings (section 140 IO).

What happens if the creditors reject the restructuring plan?

If only one of the two majorities is missed, you may request a further vote at a new hearing (section 147(2) IO). If the rejection of the plan becomes final, the proceedings continue as bankruptcy proceedings and the business may be realised.

How long do restructuring proceedings take?

The hearing on the restructuring plan usually takes place sixty to ninety days after the opening (section 168 IO). If the plan is accepted and confirmed, the proceedings are terminated once the confirmation is final. By then the payment period under the plan, no more than two years from acceptance, is already running.

What do restructuring proceedings cost?

The costs depend on the type and course of the proceedings: the flat court fee (Pauschal­gebühr), the administrator’s remuneration (sections 82 and 82a IO) and the remuneration of the privileged creditor protection associations (section 87a IO) follow statutory rates. I calculate an initial estimate for your case with my InsoRechner app; I will tell you the costs of my representation in advance.

Continuation and financing

Where does the money for the quota come from?

Possible sources are the surpluses of the continued business, the sale of assets the business does not need, and contributions from shareholders, relatives or investors. The quota can be paid in a lump sum or in instalments, within two years at most from the acceptance of the restructuring plan (section 141(1) IO). We work out together with your tax adviser how high the quota can be.

Can I keep running my business during the proceedings?

Yes, that is what restructuring proceedings are designed for. In self-administration you run the business under the supervision of the restructuring administrator; anything beyond the ordinary course of business needs his approval (section 171 IO). Without self-administration the insolvency administrator continues the business; you are obliged to provide him with information and to cooperate, and your knowledge of the business remains important to that work.

Are restructuring proceedings with self-administration the better choice?

Many clients want this because they wish to keep running the company themselves. Self-administration is narrower than the name suggests: transactions outside the ordinary course of business require the restructuring administrator’s approval, ordinary ones must not proceed against the administrator’s objection, and closing or reopening the business requires court approval (section 171 IO). For self-administration, the law also demands a quota one and a half times as high: 30 % instead of 20 % (sections 141 and 169 IO). We will calculate for your case whether self-administration is worth the higher quota.

Other proceedings

Bankruptcy proceedings

The opening and its effects, continuation or closure, realisation and distribution. A restructuring plan remains possible until the proceedings are terminated.

Note This page presents the proceedings in a greatly simplified and abridged form. It is no substitute for comprehensive legal advice and representation in a specific case. The provisions of the Austrian Insolvency Code cited here can be found in their current version in the Federal Legal Information System (RIS).

Dr. Lukas Peichl, attorney at law in Vienna · As at October 2026

Call: +43 1 712 33 30 Write an e-mail